From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Dermatology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Sunscreens and SPF: Reality vs. Myth

We rely on sunscreens to protect against erythema induced by sunlight. A sunscreen's sun protection factor (SPF) is measured in a highly controlled situation based on FDA requirements, which include applying the sunscreen in a layer with a thickness of 2 mg/cm2. These investigators performed a variety of studies to determine whether sunscreens are used as recommended and if the intended effect is achieved.

Studies of sunbathers at beaches in Denmark found that 65% used at least one sunscreen. Users applied the sunscreen in a layer 0.5 mg/cm2 thick. The median SPF used was 5 to 6 and was independent of skin type. Forty-three percent of users applied sunscreen only after arriving at the beach, and less than half reapplied it after swimming.

Comment: These and other previously performed studies make clear that sunscreens are not used as intended by regulatory agencies or the industry. Sunscreens are applied in too thin a layer, immediately before sun exposure (as opposed to one or two hours before, which is important for effectiveness, especially with PABA-containing sunscreens), and are rarely reapplied after swimming. The lesser protection provided by a thin layer of sunscreen cannot be compensated for by using a higher SPF: A sunscreen with an SPF of 50 applied at 0.5 mg/cm2 yields an SPF of only 2.7. The authors suggest that, rather than trying to change people's habits, changing the SPF test to use a sunscreen thickness of 1 or 0.5 mg/cm2 may be preferable.

— JS Dover

Published in Journal Watch Dermatology March 1, 1998

Citation(s):

Wulf H-C et al. Sunscreens used at the beach do not protect against erythema: A new definition of SPF is proposed. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1997 13 129-132.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1998. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.