From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Dermatology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma-- Mohs Surgery vs. Simple Excision

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma is a relatively rare skin cancer that is often invasive and extensive and that is frequently accompanied by perineural invasion. These authors retrospectively compared the management and outcome of 48 patients with microcystic adnexal carcinoma treated at 1 institution, some by Mohs surgery and some by simple excision.

Thirty-three physicians in 5 specialties -- dermatology, otolaryngology, gynecology, ophthalmology, and plastic surgery -- managed the cases. The initial biopsy had been misdiagnosed in 27 percent of cases. Three patients had had no further procedure after the initial biopsy and 22 patients had had successful further treatment by Mohs surgery. In the Mohs patients, the final defect surface area was, on average, 4 times the size of the clinically apparent area, demonstrating the large extent of subclinical tumor spread. Twenty-three patients had been treated by simple excision; 7 of these required at least 1 more procedure. Of these, 2 needed a third procedure, 1 a fourth, and 1 still had tumor after 4 procedures. After a mean follow-up period of 3.2 years, 2 Mohs patients had developed recurrences, as had 1 excision patient. The difference in recurrence rates was not significant.

Comment: While Mohs surgery did not achieve a higher cure rate than conventional serial excision, it achieved tumor clearance in 1 surgical session, sparing many patients the need for multiple sessions. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma is a slow-growing tumor; long-term follow-up of 5 to 10 years will be needed to determine whether Mohs surgery provides a cure rate advantage over conventional serial excision. The high number of initial misdiagnoses supports a recommendation that skin biopsies be interpreted by experienced dermatopathologists.

— GJ Hruza

Published in Journal Watch Dermatology November 22, 2000

Citation(s):

Chiller K et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: forty-eight cases, their treatment, and their outcome. Arch Dermatol 2000 Nov 136 1355 -1359.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.