From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Dermatology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Young, Beautiful, and Tan: Teenagers and Indoor Tanning

Another health challenge for caretakers of adolescents

American teenagers are happily stepping into tanning booths to achieve a "healthy" tan. These authors used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health survey to assess the prevalence and predictors of tanning booth use among 6903 white teenagers from across the U.S. (grades, 7-12; age range, 13-19) who responded to questions about sociodemographic factors, skin type, sunbathing habits, risk behaviors, psychosocial measures, and appearance (e.g., body mass index and body image).

Young women were the greatest consumers of indoor tanning: 28% of female students versus 7% of male students reported 3 or more tanning sessions, and 47% of 18- to 19-year-old women tanned versus 11% of 13- to 14-year-olds. Use of indoor tanning also increased with greater tanning response, from 13% of the poor tanners to 38% of those with strong response. Students residing in the Midwest or South had the highest use, despite no lack of available outdoor sunlight in southern regions. Dieters, students at rural high schools, and those who used two or more controlled substances were also more likely to tan indoors. Decreased odds of indoor tanning booth use were observed among those with college-educated mothers and greater cognitive ability.

Comment: Our teenagers still love to be tan. UV radiation is a classified carcinogen, and melanoma is on the rise, yet indoor tanning is as popular as ever. Americans are fighting to protect our youth from tobacco -- it's time to wage the same battle against indoor tanning.

— Mary Wu Chang, MD

Published in Journal Watch Dermatology October 28, 2003

Citation(s):

Demko CA et al. Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003 Sep; 157:854-60.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.